株式会社オブライト
Software Development2026-02-27

OpenClaw Running Costs Explained: 7 Ways to Optimize Your API Spending

A detailed breakdown of OpenClaw running costs including hardware, API fees, and electricity, along with seven practical techniques to reduce your monthly API spending.


The Full Picture of OpenClaw Running Costs

OpenClaw running costs break down into three main components. First is the hardware cost, a one-time purchase such as a Mac mini. The current Mac mini with the M4 chip starts at approximately $599 (¥94,800). Second is the API usage fee, which represents the largest and most variable monthly expense. You are billed per request to the AI model, so the total depends heavily on how you use the system. Third is electricity, and thanks to the Mac mini's energy-efficient design, running it 24/7 costs only about ¥500 (roughly $3-4) per month. Among these three components, API usage offers the most room for optimization and accounts for the largest share of ongoing costs. This article provides a comprehensive look at total running costs and shares practical techniques for reducing API spending.

How API Pricing Works

LLM API pricing is calculated based on the volume of input tokens and output tokens processed. A token is the smallest unit of text processing — in English, one token is roughly 0.75 words, while in Japanese, one token corresponds to approximately 0.7 characters. Pricing varies significantly across models. Within the Claude family, Haiku is the most affordable, Sonnet sits in the middle tier, and Opus is the most expensive. Specifically, Claude Sonnet costs $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. Claude Opus, on the other hand, costs $15 per million input tokens and $75 per million output tokens — five times the cost of Sonnet. OpenAI follows a similar tiered structure, with GPT-4o being substantially cheaper than the original GPT-4. Understanding this pricing model is the essential first step toward cost optimization.

What Does It Actually Cost?

Real-world API costs for OpenClaw vary widely depending on usage frequency and the types of tasks performed. Aggregating data from Reddit discussions and community reports, three general usage patterns emerge. Light use — running simple tasks a few times per week — typically costs $50 to $100 per month. Moderate use — daily business use for several hours on weekdays — falls in the $100 to $300 per month range. Heavy use — running all day with code generation and large-scale document processing — can reach $300 to $750 per month. However, these figures represent unoptimized usage. By combining the techniques outlined in this article, you can potentially reduce costs by 30 to 60 percent while maintaining the same level of productivity.

Cost Reduction Technique 1: Choose the Right Model

Not every task requires the most powerful model available. Matching model capability to task complexity is the single most effective way to reduce costs. For routine text formatting, simple code fixes, and straightforward Q&A, Haiku or Sonnet delivers more than adequate results. Reserve Opus for tasks that genuinely require advanced reasoning, such as complex architecture design or nuanced code analysis. OpenClaw supports multi-model configurations, allowing you to set rules that automatically route tasks to the appropriate model based on their type. This switching strategy alone has been reported to cut API costs by 40 to 60 percent. A practical starting point is to handle 80 percent of daily tasks with Sonnet and allocate Opus for the remaining 20 percent that truly need it.

Cost Reduction Technique 2: Leverage Prompt Caching

Prompt caching is a feature that stores frequently used context — such as system prompts and reference documents — so that repeated transmissions of the same content cost up to 90 percent less on input tokens. For example, if you are sending the same project specification or coding guidelines as context with every request, enabling caching dramatically reduces costs from the second request onward. To enable prompt caching with Anthropic's API, you add the appropriate cache control parameters to your request headers. This feature is especially valuable for workflows that repeatedly reference long documents or project-specific instructions. In such scenarios, caching alone can save 20 to 30 percent of your monthly API bill.

Cost Reduction Technique 3: Optimize Task Granularity

The way you design your prompts has a direct impact on costs. First, break complex tasks into smaller, sequential steps. Sending a massive block of information with a request to process everything at once consumes more tokens than a step-by-step approach. Second, avoid sending unnecessary context. Including unrelated file contents or background information that the model does not need wastes input tokens. Third, write specific instructions. Vague prompts lead to longer AI outputs, and output tokens are more expensive than input tokens. Instead of saying 'improve the error handling in this file,' say 'add separate catch blocks for network errors and timeouts in this function's try-catch block.' Precise instructions lead to concise, targeted responses that cost less.

Cost Reduction Technique 4: Set Usage Limits

Preventing overuse through budget caps and scheduling is a straightforward but effective cost control measure. Most API providers allow you to set daily and monthly spending limits. Anthropic's dashboard, for example, lets you configure a monthly usage cap that automatically stops requests once reached. Additionally, restricting OpenClaw's active hours to business hours (weekdays 9 AM to 6 PM) can dramatically reduce costs compared to 24/7 operation. Idle detection is another useful feature — automatically disconnecting from the AI after a period of inactivity prevents unnecessary token consumption from an unattended session. Start with conservative budget caps, observe your actual usage patterns over a few weeks, and then adjust the limits to match your real needs.

Cost Reduction Technique 5: Use Local LLMs Alongside Cloud APIs

Not every task needs a cloud API call. Tools like Ollama allow you to run local LLMs directly on your Mac mini at zero API cost. A hybrid approach — handling simple tasks locally and reserving cloud APIs for tasks that require superior reasoning or large context windows — is highly effective. Tasks such as code formatting, adding simple comments, and generating boilerplate text can be handled by local models with perfectly acceptable quality. The M4-equipped Mac mini can comfortably run models in the 7B to 13B parameter range. By adopting this hybrid strategy, you can potentially reduce the number of cloud API requests by over 50 percent, translating directly into lower monthly bills.

Cost Reduction Technique 6: Take Advantage of the Batch API

For tasks that do not require immediate responses, consider using the Batch API. Anthropic's Batch API offers approximately a 50 percent discount compared to standard API pricing. It is ideal for bulk document summarization, translation, batch code reviews, and other non-time-sensitive processing. A practical workflow is to queue up tasks during the day and submit them as a batch for overnight processing. While results may take up to 24 hours, they are ready by the next morning. If 30 to 40 percent of your monthly API usage can be shifted to batch processing, you stand to reduce your overall API costs by 15 to 20 percent.

Cost Reduction Technique 7: Consider Cloudflare Workers as an Alternative

If you want to avoid the upfront hardware cost or only need a lightweight setup, running an AI agent on Cloudflare Workers is another option. Plans start at just $5 per month, and no hardware purchase is required. However, compared to the full Mac mini configuration, there are trade-offs: you cannot run local LLMs alongside cloud APIs, direct file system access is limited, and execution time constraints apply. This option is well suited for small-scale usage or testing, but for serious business workloads, the Mac mini-based setup remains the recommended approach. Evaluate your usage scale and requirements to choose the configuration that best fits your needs.

Monthly Cost Simulation

Let us simulate the monthly running cost for a typical small-to-medium business scenario. Hardware cost, with the Mac mini at ¥94,800 amortized over three years, comes to approximately ¥3,000 per month. API usage, with the optimization techniques from this article applied, typically falls in the ¥15,000 to ¥30,000 per month range for standard business use. Electricity adds about ¥500 per month. The total comes to ¥18,500 to ¥33,500 per month (roughly $120 to $220). This is a fraction of a single employee's salary, and when you consider the volume of work that AI can handle or assist with, the return on investment is remarkably high. With further optimization, it is entirely feasible to bring API costs closer to the lower end of ¥15,000.

Conclusion

OpenClaw's running costs are fully manageable with the right optimization strategies in place. By combining model selection, prompt caching, task granularity optimization, usage limits, local LLM integration, Batch API usage, and infrastructure choices, you can significantly reduce your API spending without sacrificing productivity. At Oflight, our OpenClaw setup service includes cost optimization configuration tailored to your specific business needs and usage patterns. Our monthly maintenance plans also include ongoing API usage monitoring and tuning to prevent unnecessary expenses from creeping in over time. If you have concerns about costs, feel free to reach out for a free consultation to discuss the best approach for your situation.

Feel free to contact us

Contact Us